|SUBMIT POSTER HERE||SUBMIT YOUR WORKSHOP|
|Deadline: 17:00 EST February 19, 2021 (extended from Feb 15)||Deadline: 17:00 EST February 19, 2021 (extended from Feb 15)|
We would welcome conference contributions abstracts, workshops and or keynote addresses including but not limited to the following topics:
- Innovations in Care Delivery or Monitoring
- Telemedicine and Virtual Care
- Remote Monitoring and Wearable Technology
- Preparing, Protecting and Supporting
- Family Caregivers
Please read the submission guidelines below
Abstracts submitted to the 9th National Spinal Cord must meet approved standards for scientific quality and consistency, and they must be submitted correctly. They will be evaluated by peer review by one or more reviewers with expertise on the abstract topic. Failure to comply with the submission guidelines will result in abstract rejection.
There is no limit on the number of abstracts registrants may submit. However, multiple abstracts must differ sufficiently to warrant separate presentations. Submission of multiple abstracts with similar content may result in the rejection of one or more of the abstracts.
Abstracts will be automatically rejected if they do not meet the following criteria:
|Author||Format as described below|
|Word length||2600 characters|
|Tables / Figures||Maximum of 2 within the specified dimensions|
|Structured format||Background/Objectives: / Methods/Overview: / Results: / Conclusions:|
What information do I need to complete the submission process?
- Once you have submitted your abstract, you will be assigned an abstract number and you will receive a confirmation email with a link to go back and edit or review your abstract.
- Abstracts can be edited at any time after submission, prior to the abstract submission deadline.
- Do not withdraw a paid abstract submission if edits are needed or try to begin a new submission. Abstracts can be edited at any time after submission prior to the abstract submission deadline.
- A flat fee of $100.00 (CAD) will be charged at the end of each abstract submission.
- Payment can be made via Paypal. If you do not have a Paypal account, you can select to pay by credit card (Visa, MasterCard or American Express) once directed to the Paypal screen.
- The abstract submission fee is a non-refundable processing fee, and not based on approval of your abstract submission or attendance.
- The abstract submission fee does not register you for the meeting. Separate registration fees apply. All presenters must register for the meeting in order to attend the conference. Conference registration is now open in January and registration rates will be posted on the website.
- A template for poster presentations will be provided. More details regarding the format for the poster session will be available in January 2021 (prior to the March deadline).
Priority for invited oral presentations and awards will be given to abstracts and workshops linked to the conference theme. However, abstracts regarding topics outside of the conference themes are welcome; Abstracts should be submitted in one of the following three categories:
- Knowledge Generation: This category is for original research including innovative discovery, emerging evidence, therapies and outcome measures.
- Clinical/Best Practice Implementation: This category is for integrative and multidisciplinary approaches to healthcare delivery, descriptions of practice equity/ gaps, work highlighting effective practice or best practice implementation.
- Health Services, Economics and Policy Change: Submissions related to raising social awareness, developing health services, conducting economic analyses, and advocating for policy change.
- Technology Innovation: Submissions related to new technological developments, validation, AI or deep learning.
Any student submissions should indicate the first author is a student in order to be award eligible. Awards for Undergraduate students, graduate students and fellows will be presented. Student awardees will be asked to provide their student card as evidence of registration.
Additionally, you will be asked to select a Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) that best represents your abstract.
- bold and lower-cased with the exception of the first word, proper nouns, and the first word after a colon.
- Avoid abbreviations and acronyms in titles where feasible.
- Character restriction of 255.
- No symbols may be used in the title
- Author names in this order and separated by comma, First name Middle name/initial Last name, for example: Beverley Catharine Craven or Beverley C. Craven
- Indicate affiliation(s) with numeral(s) following last name.
- No degrees after names
- Should correspond with author order sequentially
Corresponding superscript number (eg. 1,2,3,4,5) precedes the author affiliation.
- Affiliation consists of Institution, Location (city, state/provincial abbreviation, country abbreviation)
i.e. Dept of Medicine Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CA
Body of abstract:
- Limit main body to 2600 characters. Do not include tables, or graphs.
- Headings are included in the character count
- Funding, Conflict of Interest and key words do not apply towards the character restriction.
- Content is structured by subheading with a colon
- Each section is treated as a paragraph with no indents.
- Subheads may include but are not limited to:
- Outside of word count restrictions:
- Funding: (optional)
- Conflict of Interest: (optional)
- Keywords: 3 keywords, capitalized (sentence case) and separated by commas, must use MESH terms.
*** SCI-RA will convert subheading to bold prior to submission to JSCM
A Sample Abstract for the Purpose of Correct Submission Must Look Like This
Anna L. Smith1, Robert G. Davis2
1Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
2Laboratory Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Background/Objectives. Previous research with structured abstracts has taken place in mainly medical contexts. This research indicated that such abstracts are more informative, more readable, and more appreciated by readers than are traditional abstracts.
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that structured abstracts might also be appropriate for a particular psychology journal.
Methods/Overview. 24 traditional abstracts from the Journal of Educational Psychology were re-written in a structured form. Measures of word length, information content and readability were made for both sets of abstracts, and 48 authors rated their clarity.
Results. The structured abstracts were significantly longer than the original ones, but they were also significantly more informative and readable, and judged significantly clearer by these academic authors.
Conclusions. These findings support the notion that structured abstracts could be profitably introduced into many journals.
Awards will be made in the following four categories:
- Patient Care
Any questions regarding abstract submission can be directed to:
CSCI-RA, 613-531-9210, email@example.com
Authors will be notified of acceptance or rejection via email.
Click here for a helpful paper which offers tips and guidelines on how to write a successful abstract: http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/respcare/49/10/1206.full.pdf