|SUBMIT YOUR LATE BREAKING POSTER|
|Submission Window for Late Breaking Posters:||MAY 15-JUNE 28|
We would welcome conference contributions abstracts, workshops and or keynote addresses including but not limited to the following topics:
- Sex differences in spinal cord injury neurorecovery (animal and human models)
- Sexual functioning and sex life after spinal cord injury
- Sex and Gender Considerations in Research Design and Knowledge Translation Activities
- Gender considerations for technology design development and deployment
- Gender differences in rehabilitation outcomes
- Women’s health – theoretical and diagnostic considerations
- Issues related to sexual satisfaction , contraception, fertility and pregnancy
- Issues related to onset of menses, amenorrhea or menopause among women
- LGBTQ management considerations across the lifespan
- Recognizing and escaping assault and or abuse
Please read the submission guidelines below
Abstracts submitted to the 8th National Spinal Cord must meet approved standards for scientific quality and consistency, and they must be submitted correctly. They will be evaluated by peer review by one or more reviewers with expertise on the abstract topic. Failure to comply with the submission guidelines will result in abstract rejection.
There is no limit on the number of abstracts registrants may submit. However, multiple abstracts must differ sufficiently to warrant separate presentations. Submission of multiple abstracts with similar content may result in the rejection of one or more of the abstracts.
Abstracts will be automatically rejected if they do not meet the following criteria:
|Author||Format as described below|
|Word length||2600 characters (Deduct 150 characters for each table or graphic)|
|Tables / Figures||Maximum of 2 within the specified dimensions|
|Structured format||Background/Objectives: / Methods/Overview: / Results: / Conclusions:|
|Images||Spreadsheets not to exceed 6 columns. jpegs not to exceed 6.5″ x w|
Priority for invited oral presentations and awards will be given to abstracts and workshops linked to the conference theme. However, abstracts regarding topics outside of the conference themes are welcome; Abstracts should be submitted in one of the following three categories:
- Knowledge Generation
- Clinical/Best Practice Implementation
- Health Services, Economics and Policy Change
Any student submissions should indicate the first author is a student in order to be award eligible. Awards for Undergraduate students, graduate students and fellows will be presented. Student awardees will be asked to provide their student card as evidence of registration.
Additionally, you will be asked to select a Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) that best represents your abstract.
- bold and lower-cased with the exception of the first word, proper nouns, and the first word after a colon.
- Avoid abbreviations and acronyms in titles where feasible.
- Character restriction of 255.
- No symbols may be used in the title
- Author names in this order and separated by comma, First name Middle name/initial Last name, for example: Beverley Catharine Craven or Beverley C. Craven
- Indicate affiliation(s) with numeral(s) following last name.
- No degrees after names
- Should correspond with author order sequentially
Corresponding superscript number (eg. 1,2,3,4,5) precedes the author affiliation.
- Affiliation consists of Institution, Location (city, state/provincial abbreviation, country abbreviation)
i.e. Dept of Medicine Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CA
Body of abstract:
- Limit main body to 2600 characters
- Headings are included in the character count
- Funding, Conflict of Interest and key words do not apply towards the character restriction.
- Content is structured by subheading with a colon
- Each section is treated as a paragraph with no indents.
- Subheads may include but are not limited to:
- Outside of word count restrictions:
- Funding: (optional)
- Conflict of Interest: (optional)
- Keywords: 3 keywords, capitalized (sentence case) and separated by commas, must use MESH terms.
*** SCI-RA will convert subheading to bold prior to submission to JSCM
A Sample Abstract for the Purpose of Correct Submission Must Look Like This
Anna L. Smitha, Robert G. Davisb
aLaboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
bLaboratory Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Background/Objectives. Previous research with structured abstracts has taken place in mainly medical contexts. This research indicated that such abstracts are more informative, more readable, and more appreciated by readers than are traditional abstracts. Objectives. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that structured abstracts might also be appropriate for a particular psychology journal.
Methods/Overview. 24 traditional abstracts from the Journal of Educational Psychology were re-written in a structured form. Measures of word length, information content and readability were made for both sets of abstracts, and 48 authors rated their clarity.
Results. The structured abstracts were significantly longer than the original ones, but they were also significantly more informative and readable, and judged significantly clearer by these academic authors.
Conclusions. These findings support the notion that structured abstracts could be profitably introduced into many journals.
Awards will be made in the following four categories:
- Patient Care
Any questions regarding abstract submission can be directed to:
CSCI-RA, 613-531-9210, email@example.com
Authors will be notified of acceptance or rejection via email.
Click here for a helpful paper which offers tips and guidelines on how to write a successful abstract: http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/respcare/49/10/1206.full.pdf